No tienes acceso a esta clase

¡Continúa aprendiendo! Únete y comienza a potenciar tu carrera

Let's review your knowledge!

11/17
Recursos

Aportes 67

Preguntas 3

Ordenar por:

¿Quieres ver más aportes, preguntas y respuestas de la comunidad?

I’m working on it because I haven’t finished to read the book I want to review 😛
But I’ll share the paragraph I wrote as the hook. Tell me if it works, please!

Some pens are forced to carry with them the history of their countries. Some of them are the tool to build a path where people can walk and admire their past and the way things used to be.
Born in the middle of one of the green corners of Portugal, touched by letters before the soccer passion or the swearing of Hippocrates, António Lobo Antunes was and is the transmutation between the scalpel and the pen. A pen who has written about Benfica as his local paradise and a witness of beauty and pain in the fluent of life.

Malcolm in the middle

Malcolm in the middle. Why we connected with this series? Because it showed the reality of many families and combined with humor. As Latinos/as, we felt that.

It can be seen as just another series, but for me it’s quite different since that family is not perfect and has real problems. That’s what makes the series more human. Imperfection is part of humanity. Anyways, here are my reasons.

Lois and Hal get married and they think their life will be perfect. Unfortunately, no sooner had they had their first son than they realized that they were in a pretty pickle. Francis is probably the most problematic of their children.

If that were not enough, the couple has 4 children more (5 in total). All of them have their particularities.

The socioeconomic status. Maybe it’s believed that in North America people don’t have economic problems. Nothing further from reality. And I think here is were most people really feels a connection with the series. Malcolm’s family struggles to survive and it’s even more difficult when the parents are impulsive while spending money.

Malcolm, the genius boy. Ok, partially genius. Malcolm is a very intelligent person, but only in certain contexts. He belonged to an advanced class in which only certain people who met with certain criteria could get in. But on the other hand, his social relationships are a disaster. Everybody agrees that Malcolm only thinks about himself and doesn’t pay attention to others.

All in all, it’s a great series that shows the real life of a Californian family in the 2000s. But many Latinos/as really connected, because that imperfection is part of our situation as well (in most of the cases). And humor is what makes the series really funny.

What do you think about it? Let me know in the comments section.

here is mine. bit long but i’d appreciate if anybody reads it. 😃
Critical review – Succession (TV series)
Succession is currently, in the opinion of many people the best TV show on the air and I definitely have to agree with those statements of acclamation that the show is constantly receiving.
Succession is acclaimed for its characters and the artists who represent them, tough people, intense discussions, memorable dialogues and thrilling situations that let the viewer wanting to keep watching until the end of the season. The plot is simple, a dysfunctional powerful family with creed, grudge between others, betrayal and with the infinite desire of rule the family business. When I say powerful is literally powerful, as the business the family own is one the biggest media and entertainment conglomerate in the world (valued in more than 80B dollars). In the course of the show what people watch is the founder of the company and leader of the family, an 80 year old man who refuses to withdraw from the company despite his advanced age and the crisis that the conglomerate is facing, his sons, full of creed aim to the CEO position and their father, who chapter after chapter seems like he hates them, does whatever it takes to stay in control.

One important plus for the show is that is not focused in one main character as many others, instead, in succession all characters are main characters, everyone is playing his game, and at the end, perhaps all are bad people, thus, the audience find hard to support one of them, or maybe to try to predict what’s going to happen next turns difficult, so the excitement grows chapter after chapter.

Aside from the actors, the production is stunning, since the show has to recreate the fancy and luxurious life of a family with billions of dollars in their account, and indeed they do it great, the sceneries, locations and all the stuff we see in succession is amazing, it makes us realize that is everything but a cheap production. And last but not least, the music. The music of the show is 10 out of 10, just compared in my personal opinion with the great soundtrack of game of thrones.

Fans are waiting for season four, while the shows grows in popularity and acclamation, and I hope that anybody who read this do a favor for their selves and watch this great show which surely will become in one of the greatest of all time.

My favorite podcast: “Doubts are given” ( “Se regalan dudas” )

Doubts are given is a podcast were Lety and Ashley interview domain knowledge experts about specific topics, so the listener can learn and comprehend the subject discussed. Commonly, the topics are controversial or current problems that the society faces. About the topics I can mention: love, happiness, drogs, life purpouse, sex, among many other themes.
My favorite podcast is about love because as many of us we have enjoyed it, cried for it and felt lot of thing through getting in love.
Other podcast, that really amazed me, was about the interview with a woman named Saski who has a organization that helps criminals to come back to the society, in a good way, after comply with their time in jail.
And the last podcast that I am going to talk, it was about to be happy with a life purpose. Since life purpouse is essential to achieve a life goal, it is also fundamental in a small parts of our life such as to be happy, productive, and feel special in your everyday routine.
Finally, I want to invite you to hear this podcast and think if after the podcast you change your mind about something or you realized something that you didn’t know.

p.s. they didn’t pay me for this advertisement

Project Hail Mary is one of the best science fiction books I’ve ever read.

Ryland Grace wakes up in a spaceship. He doesn’t know why he is there or even how he got up there. A medical robot is above him. He is surprisingly in good shape. Grace starts to remember that he has an important mission: to save planet Earth.

This novel is extremely well written. The chapters have the perfect length and timing. The way of writing of the author is excellent.

Project Hail Mary is an amazing space adventure that you should read. Will Grace save planet Earth?

There are many opinions about what it means to be a chef. Some say it is just a position in a kitchen and others think it is a position in life. Series "Guerra de cucharas" in Netflix LATAM explains with proficiency this topic. Reach me to review this series and decide what is a chef in Korea.
Have you ever felt that your life is boring or that you should have more? Well, that's what happened to Walter White in the series Breaking Bad. We follow a man who has just turned 40 and realizes he's not living the life he wanted. Unfulfilled and unhappy, he's about to take a dramatic turn. As we can see, most of us can relate to this situation. And over the course of six intense seasons, the series Breaking Bad masterfully portrays how a mild-mannered teacher transforms into a ruthless, calculating criminal. In this thrilling story, starting on Walter's side, we're drawn into a gripping journey that ends with us waiting for his ultimate downfall. One aspect that could be improved is that Breaking Bad's TV format, tailored for pre-streaming platforms, sometimes feels dated. The episodic structure and recap segments, while necessary at the time, can make the storytelling feel slow-paced or repetitive. Despite its dated format, Breaking Bad remains a must-see in my opinion. It embodies the essence of a compelling 21st-century story, keeping you on the edge of your seat with its masterful storytelling.
**Critical Review of *Naruto*** *Naruto*, the anime adaptation of Masashi Kishimoto’s popular manga, is a cultural phenomenon that has left a profound impact on fans of Japanese animation. Spanning 720 episodes across *Naruto* and *Naruto: Shippuden*, the series follows the life of Naruto Uzumaki, a young ninja with dreams of becoming the strongest leader of his village, the Hokage. While it delivers exhilarating battles, profound emotional arcs, and deep character development, *Naruto* is not without its flaws. This review critically explores the series' narrative, character dynamics, themes, and technical execution, while addressing both its strengths and weaknesses. **Strengths:** One of *Naruto’s* defining strengths lies in its rich world-building and extensive lore. Kishimoto's creation is deeply immersive, with its intricate history of clans, villages, and a well-constructed system of ninjutsu that blends mysticism with combat strategy. The political intricacies between villages, the ethical dilemmas surrounding war and peace, and the exploration of power dynamics give the series a complex socio-political backdrop. The Five Great Shinobi Nations, with their respective unique abilities and rivalries, make the setting feel expansive and multi-layered. Character development is another strong point, particularly with its protagonist, Naruto Uzumaki. His growth from a loud, obnoxious outcast to a mature, determined leader is compelling. Naruto's unrelenting optimism, despite the discrimination he faces due to harboring the Nine-Tails beast inside him, serves as the emotional core of the series. Other characters, such as Sasuke Uchiha and Kakashi Hatake, are also deeply explored, their motivations and backstories gradually revealed to provide depth beyond their initial impressions. The series excels in its portrayal of themes such as perseverance, the cycle of hatred, and the importance of bonds. Naruto's steadfast belief in breaking the vicious cycle of revenge and hatred drives the story forward, and many of the most intense conflicts stem from characters grappling with their own pain and ideologies. This theme resonates deeply, especially through key antagonists like Pain and Madara Uchiha, who have their own tragic justifications for seeking destruction. Visually, *Naruto* boasts some stunning animation, particularly in its high-stakes battles. The choreographed fight sequences, combined with the creative use of ninjutsu, make for engaging action scenes. Episodes like Naruto vs. Pain and the Fourth Great Ninja War arc showcase the anime's technical brilliance in animating fast-paced, epic clashes that leave a lasting impression. **Weaknesses:** Despite its undeniable strengths, *Naruto* suffers from significant narrative issues that undermine its overall impact. One of the most glaring problems is the pacing. The series is infamous for its filler episodes—content not present in the original manga—some of which feel repetitive and dilute the intensity of the main storyline. While the purpose of fillers is understandable from a production standpoint, their overabundance (especially in *Naruto: Shippuden*) tests viewers’ patience and disrupts the flow of crucial arcs. Character treatment is another issue. While Naruto, Sasuke, and a few others are thoroughly fleshed out, many secondary characters remain underdeveloped or sidelined. Prominent figures like Rock Lee, Neji Hyuga, and Tenten show early potential but are rarely given the depth or screen time they deserve in later arcs. Female characters, in particular, often fall into stereotypical roles. Sakura Haruno, despite being positioned as one of the three main characters, is frequently reduced to a love interest with minimal independent development, while Hinata Hyuga’s growth is primarily tied to her feelings for Naruto. This lack of nuanced character arcs, especially for female ninjas, limits the narrative's potential for more diverse and balanced storytelling. Thematically, while *Naruto* explores lofty ideals, the execution can be uneven. The series’ heavy emphasis on forgiveness, while admirable, sometimes leads to questionable resolutions, especially when irredeemable antagonists are quickly forgiven or converted. Sasuke’s redemption, in particular, feels rushed given his extensive history of betrayal and violence. This pattern risks oversimplifying complex moral dilemmas, reducing them to idealistic, yet unconvincing, conclusions. Finally, the ending of *Naruto*—particularly the events of the Fourth Great Ninja War—has been a point of contention among fans. While it ties up major plot threads, it introduces several power-ups and plot devices that strain believability, such as the sudden reveal of Kaguya Otsutsuki as the ultimate villain. This undermines the stakes that had been carefully built up around characters like Madara, diluting the emotional impact of the final confrontation. **Conclusion:** In conclusion, *Naruto* is an iconic anime that has rightfully earned its place in the canon of great shonen series. It offers viewers a heartfelt journey of growth, friendship, and perseverance, paired with intricate world-building and thrilling battles. However, it is also weighed down by pacing issues, underdeveloped characters, and uneven thematic execution. For all its narrative flaws, *Naruto* remains a beloved series with timeless lessons, and its influence on the genre and subsequent anime is undeniable. Fans of action-packed, character-driven stories will find much to appreciate, but those looking for consistent pacing and fully realized character arcs may find themselves frustrated.
#### **Question 1:** **"The best way to write a critical review is by summarizing everything."** * **True or False?** **Answer:** * **False.** A critical review is not a summary. It involves evaluating and being critical of all aspects of the material. #### **Question 2:** **"It is not enough to understand; you must challenge the material."** * **True or False?** **Answer:** * **True.** To write a critical review, you must challenge what you see, give your opinions, and not just understand or summarize. #### **Question 3:** **"How many structures were mentioned in the class for writing critical reviews?"** * **Answer:** * Two structures were covered for writing critical reviews.
I'm going for the first structure as I don't want it to be long. So here it is. *Wish (Disney movie)* Disney has never let me down at giving me feels and making me relate to lots of unique characters. Just as any other disney animation, "Wish" has joyful, unique and relatable characters; as well as plenty of enjoyable, moving songs and magical, fiction stories. The main character, a girl called Asha, engages in the protection of her country's people's wishes, which seem endangered under the power of their mad, cruel king. Throughout the movie, I got to notice some important aspects: * It sure is fictional, however, from beginning to end we can learn and analyze some morals/facts from it, like how everything in this world (including us) are made from the same: stardust. * Moreover, *Wish* manages to address a deep topic in an easy way for children to understand: how dreams and wishes are the spark that moves our lives, and therefore, how convenient it is for authority figures. like the king, to get rid of our goals and *wishes.* Unfortunately, I am leaving this review kind of unfinished since I ran out of time, but as a conclusion, Wish is a very interesting and educational movie mainly made for kids, but also appealing for public of any age. I would watch it again and 100% recommend it.
* False! * True. You must challenge what you are reading! * 2 structures.
critical review of La hora del juicio - Canserbero introduction what should we do about the commercial and unconscious music? In this song Canserbero will give what he thinks is a solution to the empty music and I will review what alternatives we have in addition to his solutions. evaluation: \- First I would like to say that the problem is not the music that the society listens to, the problem is the society itself, so the solution is not only the music, to change the society, but also we need other methods than the music, but the music helps as well. \- If he is aware of the problems of the society, there should be more individuals with the same level of consciousness, so there should be some artists and music furthermore his music not all the music is like the market music \- The other way to raise awareness is just with his music, and people little by little will start to change the social mentality \- Trying to go directly against the interest of so many people could be dangerous, so little by little he needs to create an evolution of the society, but not a destruction. Conclusion: We need a change of awareness for the society to help to the less fortune and create new environments to have good development for the new generations, and better quality of life for the humanity, but it is a slow process, we need to change not only the music but also the literature, the movies, the politics etc. Canserbero challenge and change the music we listen, but it is not enough we need to continue with the other aspects.
can we do a critical review about a song?
Great. I want to share mi critical review about LINKEDIN. Because is my favorite social networks and the best for networking. The best part about using Linkedin is that it has a series of tools that allow you to stay connected with your coworkers and professional colleagues. It has an option that I love, which is to make newsletters and these go directly to your followers. You have to be very careful because the tool is quite powerful and you must configure it well before using it. That's why I always suggest to my colleagues that they take a previous course. Although it is quite intuitive, it is better to be guided by a professional. I would love for them to improve the use of advertising in the inbox because it is quite uncomfortable.
* False! * True. You must challenge what you are reading! * 2 structures.
I would like to star with movie “Her” this movie was produced by netflix and it teaches us about a relationship between a human and Artificial intelligence, it shows how a lonely human can fall in love of AI because the AI shows itself how a human as its shape to talk and it does laughing to human with different themes, the human starts to believe that it can be real, moreover he asks it about if “she” belongs to him but it responds, “I belong to you and also to whatever anyone”. 1. The movie belongs to Non-fiction 2. The movie shows a perspective and it tells us that it is possible to exist as an attraction between a human and AI, because the sum of lonely human and disconnected communication among humans is wrong. 3. I believe that the movie teaches us many things about how: the importance of maintaining a connection with our families and searching spaces to try to talk with them. Conclusion:  1. The main conclusion is that we need to work on our communication and family relationship, which is more important than following connections in our electronic devices.
I want to discuss my favorite book: The Magic of Thinking Big. I don't pretend that everyone likes this book, it is only for a select group that understands what it means to think big. I would highlight the psychological methods and arguments that the author explains in different situations with different characters, it helps you to be honest with yourself, to take action but above all to believe that you can succeed.
**Critical review One hundred years of Solitude** One hundred years of Solitude, it is a book with a familiar history to everyone, we can match our lives with at least one character, and it is the best book in universal literature. The author brings us to the beginning of a little town, where a particular family takes us through the time, matching real events, assumptions and fantasy stories to tell us how life changes and how the past determines the future.  This book belongs to magic realism, it uses the imagination to transmit the common feelings and provide them with tangible features; for that, we can train our imagination and empathy when we try to understand the event in each character. The big passage offers several characters and perspectives about the life, and how evolute the Buendiafamily, Finally, Gabo offers us his perspective about death, we can infer that it is inevitable and our life is conditioned by the family and place, he uses the Buendia family to show this and how each character returns to the place where they had started their trips, his little but comfortable Macondo. In conclusion, In the variety of characters,stories and motivations we can find in our history, human life in many aspects is like a repetition for that it is our responsibility to change our future, and the best time is now, One hundred years of Solitude show us the beauty of the life and how the decisions are our unique weapon.
![](https://static.platzi.com/media/user_upload/image-c03a67dc-1348-4682-a7d1-3c30779db8fa.jpg)

I’m made the critical review of spider-man: into the spider verse

I think this movie is more that a superheroe kid movie, is a well made history, with a terrific develop of character. The story is simple a kid that is biting by a radio active spider and hive him powers sounds really easy, and also a little dumb, but the way the story try to show us how a boy had to deal with the fact that now he had powers, i think its a metaphor for grow in up, that you must to deal with the new responsibilities and the change that are coming, and all that mean while there are combats and cool fights sceens

  1. False
  2. True
  3. Two
Parenthood is difficult. *Futurama* showed us a parenthood dilema in a really particular way when Kif was pregnant and there didn’t seem to be a real mother for the children. In that order of ideas, should he have become a single father? Or did he make a good decision in choosing Amy as the mother of his children? Twenty years ago, Kif and Amy were pregnant and Kif gave birth a bunch of tadpoles that were left in a huge lake to mature before they could come out on land. Nevertheless, Leela was the biological mother because of an accident, where she touched the Kif’s bare hand. According to *Futurama*, amphibians as Kif get pregnant by touching their hands but no-one knew it until Kif said it. That meant that the children weren’t Amy’s and she didn’t want to be a mother either when she found out that Kif was pregnant, so who should be the responsible for being the mother of Kif’s children, the biological mother or the couple? In the chapter, Leela’s team have an accident that makes her and Kif touch their hands. Then, the doctor tells Kif that he is pregnant, Kif explains the process to get pregnant in their specie, and profesor Hubert use a machine to determine who is the mother, realizing that it’s Leela. This is a strong moment for Amy because she has contradictory thoughts, she doesn’t want to be a mother so young, but she hates the idea of Kif being pregnant with Leela. She has to fight inside between his love for Kif and the terror of being a mother. Despite the extravagance of the mode of pregnancy, this is a normal situation in real life, where young couples get pregnant and they have to decide what to do. The episode show us all the feelings, thoughts, fears and doubts during pregnancy, they also make use feel the Kif’s pain and sadness for Amy’s abandonment, and the Amy’s terror for being a mom. This is a funny and original way to show a critical problem in real life, and the author decided to put love above all at the end of the chapter, when Amy decided to accompany Kif when he gave birth. Finally, she realized that the tadpoles had to live some years in a lake before their passage to earth, a fact that made her feel better since she had some years more before to have their children as part of their family. The chapter is well structured, they presented the whole process of pregnancy in minutes, the power of love over fear, and invented particular funny ways of giving birth by an alien race. Although, doubt about how two such different species can get pregnant exists. Leela is a human and she has a completely different reproductive system so, how could she get him pregnant? Despite having a complete beautiful panorama related to pregnancy and couples, there’s a plot gap regarding the biological process of pregnancy between two different races. How real can it be that a human and an alien get pregnant? We, as viewers, are amused by the situation and surprised by the diversity of forms of pregnancy, but I don’t think that this can be biologically real. However, talking about a fiction serie, I think we can let this detail go. Having a complete overview of Kif’s pregnancy, we can say that the chapter presented not only the difficult situation of an unexpected pregnancy, but also the fact of not always knowing the real parents. The Amy’s decision was satisfactory, and seeing her supporting her partner is what we all want to have in the same situation. The real parents are who raise and love their children, because giving birth can be done by anyone, but parenting is unique to parents. Finally, I only had a complete and satisfactory ending when, some chapters later (actually, in the last season), Amy and Kif came back for their children and had a family of five (the other tadpoles died trying to go out of the lake), and it was funny to found out the great similarity between Leela and the three children. But in the end, Amy gave her best effort to become a mother and learned to raise and love her children, even though they seemed more interested in Leela.
La La Land( movie) This movie shows the lifes of two artists, that help each other to reach their dreams. I'll Focus in their romantic relationship. The movie shows a beautifull story, but at some point they start to take some decisions that affect they in a deeply way, as a result ay the end they don't stay together, even, her finally get married with other men and have a daugther. In my opinión ir don't make sense. Why? You shouldn be asking, well I knos that in the real life this kinds of situatios happens, but if you wanna enjoy a movie why have you to suffer with the same result? It don't make sense for me.
  1. A Critical review is not a sumary – FALSE
  2. You must challenge the material – TRUE
  3. TWO structures

F.R.I.E.N.D.S

CRITICAL REVIEW:

Friends a comedy that left a mark in at least three generations, is it the best serie of them all? Let me give you my point of view of it

Throught the years this serie showed to be the favorite of a huge group of people around the world and it was tendency as the most seen in WARNER BROS and other tv channels, it is not weird that is still on air due to the facility that this serie has to get the people connected wiht the stories that happens inside, as it is based on a group of friends comformed by 6 people of different socioeconomic levels that become frinds and start supporting each other while they fall in love, get an economic stability, and overcome some childhood traumas.

Friends is known by creating funny moments from weird, embarrasing, sad problems that all face in life, that’s why you will feel so engaged whith it, because you will picture yourself in any situation the characters are facing and get joy living the process.

To sum up this serie gathers all kind of experiences that each of us can go during our lives, gives you joy from those problems, and let you live some moments vividly in different points of view.

I’ve been reading a book and so i like to share a review of it, the book speaks how to change the world, but that book sometimes is hard and probably it isn’t good for all. Anyway i couldn’t come up with look for some information about it and but in hindsight the book says the truth, the government or the president won’t change the country cause’ they can’t, since people don’t change their lifestyle

introduction. the treasure island for me is the most impressive serie that i remembered, i always saw it in the tv show and i still do it spite of that it was many year ago.
overview of the material. this tv show we have pirates, treasure, action, drama and tragedy. Evaluation It´s a good serie because this capture all my atencion in those days even now. point 1. It ´s believed that the pirates never find the treasure. point 2. it´s said that the captain only want to be free of guilty and he helps to both parts. point 3 when you see the show you are thinking of participaiting in the quest. conclusion. This program it seems that you are looking for the trasure with some help of the others.

My ussually topic for read are the financial, economy, personal development and forms of the able persuading in the opinions of the people. To me is very important each one of this topics because any topic of them that you decide give you many usefull information regarding to the book that you pick. Just in this moment I’m reading a book named “The art of the deal” by Donald Trump that really this book I’m like me. This book has a containt very interesting about how this great busisnessman had achievement all the sucessful that now he had.

Have you ever experienced the sensation of being awake in your dreams? Although capable of influencing certain conditions and interactions, still lacking control over the output and the events just seem to pass you by? That is the feeling I have got from Tales From the Lꝏp.

Tales From the Loop is a series that revolves around the lives of people from a small town located upon a physics laboratory known as “the loop” and the uncanny sci-fi events that unfold in this location, characterized somehow by a rather mysterious beauty. It depicts ideas such as alternate realities, stopping time, conscious transfer, humanoid robots, as well as the way each character deals with these situations from their own psychological standpoints.

Something that I have found particularly fascinating about it and that definitely sets it apart from other sci-fi shows one might encounter, is the scene composition. Even though I am not an expert in cinematography and some critics have argued it is slow-paced, I can tell you that it embodies a unique esthetic which resembles – somewhat – that of a classical painting.

here is mine. bit long but i’d appreciate if anybody reads it. 😃
Critical review – Succession (TV series)
Succession is currently, in the opinion of many people the best TV show on the air and I definitely have to agree with those statements of acclamation that the show is constantly receiving.
Succession is acclaimed for its characters and the artists who represent them, tough people, intense discussions, memorable dialogues and thrilling situations that let the viewer wanting to keep watching until the end of the season. The plot is simple, a dysfunctional powerful family with creed, grudge between others, betrayal and with the infinite desire of rule the family business. When I say powerful is literally powerful, as the business the family own is one the biggest media and entertainment conglomerate in the world (valued in more than 80B dollars). In the course of the show what people watch is the founder of the company and leader of the family, an 80 year old man who refuses to withdraw from the company despite his advanced age and the crisis that the conglomerate is facing, his sons, full of creed aim to the CEO position and their father, who chapter after chapter seems like he hates them, does whatever it takes to stay in control.

One important plus for the show is that is not focused in one main character as many others, instead, in succession all characters are main characters, everyone is playing his game, and at the end, perhaps all are bad people, thus, the audience find hard to support one of them, or maybe to try to predict what’s going to happen next turns difficult, so the excitement grows chapter after chapter.

Aside from the actors, the production is stunning, since the show has to recreate the fancy and luxurious life of a family with billions of dollars in their account, and indeed they do it great, the sceneries, locations and all the stuff we see in succession is amazing, it makes us realize that is everything but a cheap production. And last but not least, the music. The music of the show is 10 out of 10, just compared in my personal opinion with the great soundtrack of game of thrones.

Fans are waiting for season four, while the shows grows in popularity and acclamation, and I hope that anybody who read this do a favor for their selves and watch this great show which surely will become in one of the greatest of all time.yes

  • The best way to write a critical review is by summarising everything.
    FALSE
  • It is no enough to understand. You must challenge the material
    TRUE
  • How many structures were mentioned in the class?
    Two specific structures

m working on it because I haven’t finished to read the book I want to review 😛
But I’ll share the paragraph I wrote as the hook. Tell me if it works, please!

Some pens are forced to carry with them the history of their countries. Some of them are the tool to build a path where people can walk and admire their past and the way things used to be.
Born in the middle of one of the green corners of Portugal, touched by letters before the soccer passion or the swearing of Hippocrates, António Lobo Antunes was and is the transmutation between the scalpel and the pen. A pen who has written about Benfica as his local paradise and a witness of beauty and pain in the fluent of life

Ok

Usjusi

Jaisna

Jiahaus

Jahja

Ok

good

Some pens are forced to carry with them the history of their countries. Some of them are the tool to build a path where people can walk and admire their past and the way things used to be.
Born in the middle of one of the green corners of Portugal, touched by letters before the soccer passion or the swearing of Hippocrates, António Lobo Antunes was and is the transmutation between the scalpel and the pen. A pen who has written about Benfica as his local paradise and a witness of beauty and pain in the fluent of life.

False
True
Two structures

’m working on it because I haven’t finished to read the book I want to review 😛
But I’ll share the paragraph I wrote as the hook. Tell me if it works, please!

Some pens are forced to carry with them the history of their countries. Some of them are the tool to build a path where people can walk and admire their past and the way things used to be.
Born in the middle of one of the green corners of Portugal, touched by letters before the soccer passion or the swearing of Hippocrates, António Lobo Antunes was and is the transmutation between the scalpel and the pen. A pen who has written about Benfica as his local paradise and a witness of beauty and pain in the fluent of life

I’m working on it because I haven’t finished to read the book I want to review 😛
But I’ll share the paragraph I wrote as the hook. Tell me if it works, please!

😊😊

  1. False! A critical review is not a summary.
  2. True!
  3. 2

In a world where blue jays and raccoons can be friends with a white immortal gorilla and live the craziest adventures that a human mind can imagine, a bit of intrigue needs to arise in you, if not, give me some of what you and the writer of this series are taking. “Regular Show” is for many criticisms a cinematographic piece of art, that has marked and influenced the childhood of many people and as one of those, I can agree that this is the most creative animated series that has been ever created.

Regular Show Is a series of Mordecai and Rigby, a blue jay and a raccoon, respectively, who work for a park where the most absurd and fictitious things happen. With a bubble gum dispenser as a boss, an immortal albino gorilla as a coworker, a fat zombie who lives with a ghost in a trailer, and the park owner’s son as the “supervisor” with ahead of the size of a beach ball, nothing can go well. Now that you have an idea of what are we talking about, let’s focus on the plot and why is impossible to find inconsistencies in the story, even being so absurd. The regular show consists of 8 seasons, with about 20 episodes each, in which every single episode is a news story, where the park gets destroyed, they fly to the space to fight mystic babies, acquire superpowers or beat each other, but okay… you get me, weird things happen in that park. There’s another interesting fact about this series and that is that each new tale has a similarity, the structure of the events. First, they are having a civilized conversation as we humans tend to do, then some of the fictitious events mentioned before occur, third, the members of the park find a conflict to fight or argue over about, like that time Skips (the albino gorilla) killed Rigby in an arm wrestling game and had to beat the Death in an arm-wrestling match to resurrect the raccoon. And finally, they reconcile with each other, agree to be friends, just to find a new problem to fight about, and repeat that sequence over and over again. Moving on, now, you understand what type of characters and tales we are talking about, nonetheless, there are many negative and criticizable aspects of this cinematographic piece. One of them is the absurdness or hyperboles, a resource that many series apply to their stories to make it seem more attractive and entertaining, overused can be annoying for viewers and it’s something I find in regular shows. For instance, Money Heist is a Spanish series where several thieves rob the banks with the best security, every time the police are close to catching them, they make it look (in the most absurd way possible) like it was always part of the plan, this each of the 4 times they robbed. This being a crucial factor of “Regular Show” can be perceived as annoying and exhausting. Additionally, being a series with each episode a different story can make it hard to trap the viewer’s attention. Think about the show where you were the most invested in, it was probably something like Stranger Things, a series that combines absurd and real-life experiences that develops a plot that catches the attention of everyone, something we can’t see on Regular Show.

To conclude, if you are the type of person who likes fictitious cinematographic plays, where they don’t follow a coherent tale, but the creativity of the writers creates absurd art that may not have you super invested but will give you an entertaining time, “Regular Show” a not regular series with humanized animals who fight mystic animals (kind off), is just for you.

  1. False. You must be prepared to give a strong opinion about a certain topic. Furthermore, synthesize information.
  2. True. You need to read a lot about the material (skimming and scanning) so definitely you have a whole understanding of it.
  3. Two structure:
  • For a short critical review:
    Introduction
    Overview
    Evaluation (Point 1, Point 2, Point 3, add more if needed)
    Conclusion

  • For a long critical review>
    Introduction
    Point 1 (Explanation + Evaluation)
    Point 2 (Explanation + Evaluation)
    Point 3 (Explanation + Evaluation)
    Conclusion

I think sometimes life gives you some situations, but some people are taking those situations in different ways. I mean, could be to take you down or make you stronger than before. The comfort zone makes you weak. Stay uncomfortable is very important to keep growing. It’s good being comfortable, but not too much time.

I like the interactive classes!

Life 3.0, Max Tegmark – [CRITICAL REVIEW]

How is the human interacting with new technologies using artificial intelligence? How will the human being interact with smarter technologies like general artificial intelligence? There are a lot of implications in this questions, Max Tegmark tries to approach many of these questions, nuancing and touching interesting topics from physics, biology, computer science, and even phylosophy.

The book starts with a sci-fi history that the author uses later to remember things to consider when building smarter artificial agents that humans. Since caveats to good things that could be achieved.

In order to consider aspects about intelligence from physics perspective the author gives a lot of amazing explanations merging sometimes with computer science side. This was expected because the author is in fact a MIT professor of physics, he is a great physicist.

When Max wants to illustrate some concepts he has given several examples, analogies and facts, sometimes it coud seem that is tangled up, or that the examples are in fact so simple, childish? But as you read the book you can notice that they are clear and wise examples.

From my perspective, it’s a great book, you will be amazed because of many interesting things that are mentioned and explained. If you wish to understand many of the hottest discussions around AI future, this book is really nice.

I share with you, a hock to star criticism with Mistborn Saga. 📚

What’s happened with the fantasy? Is the fantasy stuck in the same periplus? Tolkien created a story, and since the authors copy the formula? Those questions some of the main that most fantasy readers ask self about the fantasy gender. Because there was a moment that, fantasy doesn’t produce a new unique story, that we would want to read and devour each page as quickly locomotive. Since, authors tell the same story, but with different characters, and not that new arguments to relive this gender, nevertheless, there was written a story public by Brandon Sanderson called Mistborn, a new tribology, was not new to the readers, trilogies or sagas is very common in this ambit, but that play contents new arguments, a new way to tell a story and feel the pages as watercourse. Something that is developed with the necessary time, and dive to Mistborn, and explore who are the Mistborners, and everything started in The Final Empire.

I recommend a lot of this saga, If you like to read fiction, you have to read this book.

  1. False: It’s not only a summary.
  2. True: You need to challenge the material, you need to do give an opinion.
  3. Four: structure, reasoning, logic, conclusion, wait, there are two only?
  1. false
  2. true
  3. Two, to short and long essays

False, not only you have to summarize information but also, it is necessary to process, link and synthetize using criteria and challenging the ideas presented in order to write a proper critical review.

True, you must qestion and test all ideas being presented in the material before emitting a proper critical review. Also, confronting with your own opinion is recommended, since the reader is usually interested in knowing the writer’s point of view.

Two structures, a simple one for short reviews and a more elaborate one, where you should develop all the main ideas with its corresponding assessment.

1. False, it’s not just a summary. We need to understand all elements to create an opinion and challenge that information.
2. True. Giving a global perspective of the topic, mentioning good points and also bad points.
3. We learnt two structure examples. First one was giving an overview and then an specific evaluation point by point. Last one includes specific explanations and particular evaluations of each point.

  1. False. You have to be critical and understand the material.
  2. True. You do not have to accept everything.
  3. 2 structures were mentioned in the class.

1.False : Because you need to give share your ideas and your approach
2.-True: Because you need to express your opinions
3.- 2 examples of structures

  1. False. The main porpuse of critical review is analysis and evaluete the content in order to give a point of view, so summarise everithing is not enough.
  2. True. To writte a critical review you have quiestion all the content.
  3. Two specific structures.

1st. False, a critical review is not a summary, evaluating everything that you see
2nd. True, you must challenge all that you see. It’s not enough to understand the material, giving opinions, for instance.
3rd. 2 examples of structures.

1. False (you need to be critical of everything that you notice in the material)
2. True ( you need to challenge everything you see and give your opinions)
3. Two specific structures

  1. False
  2. True
  3. 2 structures
  1. False. The best way to do it is by challenging everything on the material.
  2. True.
  3. At least 2.
  1. The best way to write a critical review is by summarizing everything.

    False - It is not a summary! You need to evaluate everything that you see, and you need to be critical of everything that you notice in the material.
    .

  2. It is not enough to understand. You must challenge the material.

    True - You need to challenge everything you see when you are trying to be critical, you need to give your opinions.
    .

  3. How many structures were mentioned in the class?

    Two specific structures.

  1. False, When we write a critical review we have to analyze and evaluate the content.
  2. True, You have to challenge the material in order to give a critical review, not just to understand it and accept it as it is.
  3. 2Structures
  • False. Critical reviews are meant to dissect the source material and review it critically.

  • True.

  • 2 Structures.

  • False
  • True
  • 2 structures
  • False
  • True
  • Two structures