You don't have access to this class

Keep learning! Join and start boosting your career

Aprovecha el precio especial y haz tu profesión a prueba de IA

Antes: $249

Currency
$209
Suscríbete

Termina en:

1 Días
4 Hrs
6 Min
17 Seg

Roleplay: Establece límites en Inglés

20/21
Resources

What happens when work gets in the way of friendship?

It's common for friendships to suffer when friends become business partners. Rachel and Jake, former lifelong friends and now partners, show us how work stresses can seep into their personal moments. A years-long pact between them has resulted in annual meetings where they face the dual challenge of maintaining their friendship while at the same time, properly managing their company. But how do they manage to balance it? This story inspires reflections on the importance of dialogue, honesty and shared responsibility.

How do you deal with mistakes in the workplace so as not to affect the relationship?

In the workplace, mistakes are inevitable. But how do you deal with them when pride and friendship are involved? Jake faces a dilemma having submitted a report with erroneous figures to avoid the risk of being removed from his position. This highlights some key issues:

  • Honesty and accountability: Admitting mistakes is vital to maintaining transparency not only with the team, but also with yourself.
  • Open communication: By talking to Rachel, Jake has the opportunity to seek solutions and strengthen the bond of trust.
  • Separation of roles: Differentiating between the "friend" and the "co-founder" is crucial to address problematic situations objectively.

What lessons can we learn from conflict management?

The story between Rachel and Jake exemplifies that problems can be dealt with successfully if both parties are willing to listen and correct their failures. Here are some key lessons:

  • Distinguish the personal context from the professional: Although the problem arose in a work setting, resolving it requires interpersonal skills that also apply in friendship.
  • Avoid using euphemisms: Clarity is essential to resolving conflict. Jake tries to hide behind extenuating words, but Rachel pushes him to be direct.
  • The power of apology: It is not enough to acknowledge the mistake; it is just as important to apologize effectively in order to move forward.

Why is it important to maintain a tradition even in difficult times?

Despite the disagreement and stress of the situation, Rachel and Jake prioritize their Pride Pact Reunion tradition. This annual meeting has a symbolic value for them that goes beyond any business issues.

  • Strengthening bonds: Maintaining traditions fortifies the emotional connection between friends by reminding them of the roots of their relationship.
  • A needed pause: Offers a space to decompress tensions and focus on the positive.
  • A reminder of commitments: These meetings remind them of the importance of their initial pact, serving as an anchor in turbulent times.

Rachel and Jake show us through their experience that strong bonds are built and strengthened through sincerity, mutual respect and the ability to overcome challenges together. In every conflict, there also lies an opportunity to grow and learn - don't underestimate the power of good coffee and honest conversation!

Contributions 2

Questions 0

Sort by:

Want to see more contributions, questions and answers from the community?

### **EXPRESSES DISTANCE AND USES "INDIRECT SPEECH" IN ENGLISH (Role play)** * **Jake:** "The report you sent to the board last week doesn't make sense. The number increase doesn't seem to reflect our stagnant growth." * **Reason:** Rachel uses "doesn't seem to reflect" instead of directly accusing Jake of manipulating the numbers. This creates some emotional distance and avoids sounding confrontational, implying uncertainty rather than a direct statement of fact. * **Jake:** "Mistakes were made." * **Reason:** This phrase is an example of **indirect speech** using the passive voice. Jake avoids directly admitting his fault by not saying "I made a mistake." Instead, he distances himself from the responsibility by using a vague, passive construction. * **Jake:** "It was only an insignificant modification." * **Reason:** Jake uses the word "insignificant," a **hedge word** that lacks specificity and reduces the perceived importance of the mistake. This helps create emotional distance from the severity of the issue. * **Jake:** "We can call it an error and correct it." * **Reason:** Jake uses "we" to share responsibility, even though he is the one at fault. This technique distances him from taking sole responsibility for the mistake by implying it could be a shared issue.
Lovely relationship.!