Permisos en el pasado con "be allowed to"

Curso de Inglés Intermedio B1: Pronombres y Cláusulas Relativas

Contenido del curso

Introduction

1
Cláusulas y Pronombres Relativos en Inglés Intermedio
02:34 min

Relative pronouns and clauses

Essential vocabulary

Real and hypothetical situations

Using "to" and "for"

More ways to communicate in the past

Conclusions

27
Resumen de Cláusulas y Pronombres Relativos en Inglés
01:35 min

Tomar examen

Cursos Empresas Blog Live Conf Eventos Precios

0:004:22

Permisos en el pasado con "be allowed to"

Curso de Inglés Intermedio B1: Pronombres y Cláusulas Relativas

Clase 23 de 27

Clase 23 / 27

Recursos

Talking about permissions in the past is something every English learner needs to master. Whether you got permission to do something or someone explicitly denied it, there is a specific grammatical structure that will help you communicate that message clearly: be allowed to. Understanding how this structure works — and how it differs from could — will take your English to the next level.

How do you build sentences with be allowed to in the past?

The structure follows a consistent pattern that is easy to remember once you break it down [0:30]:

Subject: the person or thing performing the action.
Verb to be in past form: was or were, depending on the pronoun.
Allowed: this word carries the meaning of permission. It always ends in -ed and stays the same for every pronoun.
To + verb (infinitive) + complement: the action that was permitted or denied.

Here are two clear examples [1:20]:

I was allowed to leave early. — Someone, perhaps a boss, granted permission.
They weren't allowed to go to the prom party. — Someone, maybe parents or a school principal, explicitly said no.

Notice that after allowed the next verb always appears in its infinitive form (to leave, to go). This rule does not change regardless of the subject or tense context.

What is the difference between could and be allowed to?

This is one of the most common points of confusion for learners [2:10]. Both structures can describe past situations, but their meanings are quite different.

I couldn't attend the meeting. — Something prevented you from going. Maybe you were late, sick, or had a conflict. The focus is on ability or capacity.
I wasn't allowed to attend the meeting. — Someone explicitly told you that you could not go. The focus is on permission granted or denied by another person.

The key distinction is straightforward: could refers to your own capacity, while be allowed to means that an external person gave or refused that capacity [2:55]. Keeping this difference in mind will help you choose the right expression every time.

How can you practice be allowed to with personal experiences?

The best way to internalize this structure is by answering real questions about your own childhood [3:15]. Consider these prompts:

Were you allowed to play outside? Think about whether your parents permitted you to spend hours playing with friends.
Were you allowed to stay up late? Could you stay awake until 10, 11, or even 12 PM, or did your parents set strict bedtime rules?
Were you allowed to have a cellphone? Many people were not allowed to have one until they were teenagers — around 15 years old, for instance.

Answering these questions forces you to use the structure naturally: I was allowed to… or I wasn't allowed to… Practicing with real memories makes the grammar stick because you are connecting language to personal meaning.

Try writing your own answers using this pattern and share them — practicing out loud or in writing is the fastest path to fluency with permission expressions in the past.